I phased into old age this week
while shopping for dinnerware.
I had driven to Home Goods because my
photography could use some improvement.
Since shopping is more fun than practice and learning, I had decided to
attack the problem by acquiring a collection of photogenically mismatched
saucers and bowls. This is called logic. Or laziness.
Sometimes I confuse my “L”s. As I
was packing the newly-purchased props into the car, my brain spoke to me out of
the clear blue sky, sighing:
“Dammit, you’re a Ma’am.”
I won’t say this wasn’t
disconcerting. I’m not sure if other
people’s brains do this. I mean, you
never really know what’s going on in other people’s minds. Maybe when Joe looks at grass and Granny
Smith apples, he sees the color I call “red.”
How would we ever know? Brains
are weird. So I don’t know if other
people’s brains chat sociably with them.
In books and movies, people always think in “I.” “I’d
like to see the new Batman movie. I
wonder if nacho cheese counts as a fruit.”
But my brain always speaks in “you.”
“I cannot believe you just said that.
If you don’t get in the shower soon, squirrels are going to start falling
out of trees as you walk past.” The
voice in my head isn’t really me, per se. It’s more like one version of me: snarky and
hyper-observant and completely without mercy.
This is starting to sound a lot like
Son of Sam. Don’t worry. The worst thing brain-me has asked me to do
is to slap on some lip gloss before going to the store so the stockboys don’t
mistake me for a shambling zombie. The
minute it starts asking for ritual sacrifice or reality TV, I’ll be on the
psychiatrist’s couch. The Bachelor is nothing to mess around
with.
But back to my internal dialogue: brain-me must have been stewing over this
little gem since before I left the store.
The cashier had called me “Ma’am.”
Not “Excuse me, Ma’am, I can help you at this register” called from
across the room. An actual “Have a good
day, Ma’am,” as I was leaving – after a greeting, purchase, and inane chat about
the weather. The woman had plenty of
time to adjust any overhasty age estimate and use Miss the next time
around. But after deliberation, she
still went with Ma’am. “Have a good
day, Ma’am.” Daggers. Heart.
Gah.
For those of you from the South,
this may seem baffling. I’ve heard many a Southerner defend the use of
Ma’am as “just good manners.” To leave
it out might signify a lack of respect. “Is
that there goat wearing pantaloons?” “Yes,
Ma’am, he surely is.” Respect. In the time I spent in the South, I found
every conversation peppered with Ma’ams.
And while there, I appreciated the word as it was intended.
But here in Michigan, no one says “Yes,
Ma’am” unless they’ve spent some time in the military. Here we use “Miss” or “Ma’am” only when
trying to get a stranger’s attention. It’s
not a sign of respect; it’s just the politer version of “Hey, You” – a version
that distinguishes between men and women, and between younger women and older
women. College student? Miss.
Bachelorette party? Misses. Woman with three kids in tow? Ma’am.
And the evolution from “Miss” to “Ma’am” is a slow rite of passage for
every woman.
The Ma’am comes upon you early in
life, and it makes you giggle. When you’re
Ma’am-ed at 15, it’s downright hilarious.
When you’re Ma’am-ed at 19, you start calculating your chances of
swindling a beer out of the bartender.
When you’re Ma’am-ed at 26, though, you get a little touchy. Now things are hitting a little too close to
home. Now there might be something more
to that word choice than an inadvertent slip of the tongue. You’re reaching the turning point: the age at
which you no longer want to look older than you are.
Men don’t have this problem. They’re always “Sir,” and so a stranger’s
choice of greeting doesn’t force them to acknowledge that there is something
about their physical form that signifies “No longer youthful.” A crow’s foot, a grey hair, the haggard signs
of sun damage. “I see you’re getting
old, Ma’am” is the unabbreviated form of the phrase, and we all know it.
At 32, I’m reaching the age of Ma’am. I’ve lived a charmed life for the past few
years while finishing my degree. Attending
classes full of 19-year-olds is like basking in the soft-pink glow of vanity
lighting: reflected youth refracts the light from fine lines and wrinkles. In the absence of grey hair, people assume
you’re a 22-year-old grad student. Those
were good years. At the campus Sbarro’s,
I was always “Miss.” But those days are
over.
I’ve known for some time now that
this day would come. And in that parking
lot, brain-me decided it was time to face the truth. It spoke, resigned, the words dropping like
stones. Dammit, you’re a Ma’am. And it was the dignity of this resignation
that allowed me to stop fighting. It’s time.
There are worse things than aging, and one of them is flailing
pathetically against aging. It was bound
to happen sooner or later, and this is a better time than most. I’ve got plenty of spare time for baking goodbye-youth-cookies right now.
And there are plusses. For one thing, being old makes my opinions
eminently more respectable. The strong
political views of a Miss can be discounted as brainwashed hippie ravings. But a Ma’am?
You may disagree with her, but you probably respect that she knows her
own mind. And if her opinion is that a
pan of gooey, chocolatey bar cookies makes the perfect lunch? You’ll just have to respect that too. Besides, a Miss may get a lecture about
healthy eating habits, but nobody’s gonna try that on a Ma’am. I may grow to like being old after all.
Chocolate Dulce de Leche Bars
adapted from Gourmet
recipe by Shelley Wiseman
Dulce de Leche is a relative of caramel sauce: quite thick, and with a very slight bitter
note. In this recipe, its flavor is
largely masked by the chocolate; what it gives to the recipe is a delicious
texture: not quite gooey, but with far more chew than would be possible with
chocolate alone. Paired with an amazing,
crunchy brown-sugar shortbread crust, these bars are as close to perfect as it
gets.
Unsalted Butter [ ½ cup, softened ]
Light Brown Sugar [ packed, 1/3 cup ]
Vanilla Extract [ ½ teaspoon ]
Salt
[ ½ teaspoon ]
All-Purpose Flour [ 1 cup ]
Heavy Cream [ 1 cup ]
Dulce de Leche [ 1 cup ]
Egg Yolks [ 3 ]
Bittersweet Chocolate [ 5 ounces, finely chopped ]
1. Heat oven to 375 degrees.
2. Spray a 9-inch square baking pan with
nonstick cooking spray. I like to line
the pan with foil first, so that the bars are easy to remove and cut.
3. Mix Butter,
Brown Sugar, Vanilla and Salt until
fully combined.
4. Mix in Flour with a fork until the mixture forms a soft dough.
5. Press dough into bottom of prepared
baking pan; prick all over with a fork.
6. Bake until dough is golden, about 15-20
minutes. Set pan on rack and allow to
cool completely.
7. In a small pot, heat Heavy Cream and Dulce de
Leche to a simmer, stirring until dulce de leche has fully dissolved.
8. Whisk together Egg Yolks in a bowl.
9. Very slowly, whisk warm dulce de leche
mixture into Egg Yolks.
10. When fully combined, strain mixture into
original pot to remove any bits of egg that may have cooked.
11. Over Medium Heat, cook mixture until
thick enough that the bottom of the pan is visible as you stir (a thermometer
should read 170 degrees).
12. Remove pot from heat and stir Chocolate into mixture until completely
combined.
13. Pour mixture over cooled shortbread.
14. Place bars in fridge until cold, then cut
as desired.
Keep cookies refrigerated until serving.
[
Notes: (1) Dulce de Leche can usually be found in the
Mexican food section of larger
supermarkets; it comes in a can that resembles sweetened condensed milk cans.
(2) These bars stayed great for over a week in the fridge – the crust even stayed crunchy. ]
supermarkets; it comes in a can that resembles sweetened condensed milk cans.
(2) These bars stayed great for over a week in the fridge – the crust even stayed crunchy. ]
Lordy that looks good. I love a tin of dulce de leche - dessert in a flash. And yes, totally sympathise with the ma'am revelations. I'm just in my 20s and got called ma'am the other day. In Australia no less! The ego certainly suffered a blow.
ReplyDeleteIt's always so disconcerting, isn't it? Gah. :)
ReplyDelete